tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-61777350601905741722024-02-19T11:38:57.107-05:00The Richwine ArchiveData-driven public policy analysis.Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.comBlogger104125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-67509991658711434372023-08-10T15:48:00.004-04:002023-12-06T15:06:46.773-05:00Video of American Moment interview<div>I should have gotten a haircut first, but this was a nice discussion of both the dissertation controversy from 10 years ago and my current work on immigration policy.</div><div><br /></div><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jyBXaZdf_mQ" width="480"></iframe><br />Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-50610594083064956262021-11-23T08:02:00.001-05:002021-11-23T08:02:09.013-05:00The case against the mandates<p class="MsoNormal">[originally posted at <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-case-against-the-mandates/">National Review</a>]</p><p class="MsoNormal">The debate over vaccine mandates has fuzzy boundaries. One can
support mandating vaccinations for certain populations at risk of certain
diseases without automatically supporting all such mandates. When it comes to
Covid-19, we can argue the marginal cases, such as workers at hospitals and
nursing homes. However, there is little justification for broad-based mandates
that treat all unvaccinated people as second-class citizens. The unvaccinated should
not be denied livelihoods, barred from public accommodations, forced to mask
when others aren’t, or otherwise banned from normal participation in society.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Unfortunately, public health officials have increasingly
conflated opposition to <i>mandated</i> Covid
vaccination with opposition to <i>voluntary</i>
Covid vaccination. If the vaccines are so safe and effective, they reason, what
could be wrong with mandating them for everyone?</p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">A lot. People experience a genuine welfare loss when forced
to do something against their will. In the case of the Covid vaccines, there
are some people whose reluctance stems from deeply-held convictions about
bodily integrity and autonomy. Giving them a no-jab-no-job ultimatum causes
them psychological distress. It sows resentment, distrust, and alienation. It
stokes fears of a slippery slope. It causes real harm.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Supporters claim that vaccine mandates overcome that harm by
providing major benefits for both individual holdouts and for the broader
society. For some vaccines in some situations, this may be true. But are the
benefits of Covid vaccination really compelling enough to justify widespread coercion?</p><p class="MsoNormal">Let’s consider individuals first. The argument made by
mandate proponents goes like this: Although we generally shouldn’t micromanage
people’s health choices, recipients experience such a tremendous benefit from
the Covid vaccine that a mandate is justified for individuals’ own good. This
argument fails because it applies to only a small proportion of the people who will
actually be coerced. Take the elderly. They are by far the most vulnerable
group, and if anyone should be forced to get vaccinated for their own good, it’s
them. Well, <a href="https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-people-fully-percent-pop18">nearly
all</a> Americans age 65+ have had at least one dose of the vaccine already, so
they cannot be the primary targets of any mandate.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Among non-elderly adults, it appears that about one quarter have
not had any shots, but a large proportion of those holdouts are not in major risk
groups. For one thing, some holdouts were previously infected with Covid and
therefore already have <a href="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1">strong
immunity</a>. We don’t know what that proportion is exactly, but the CDC
estimates that about <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/burden.html">half</a>
of non-elderly adults (not specifically vaccine holdouts) have already been
infected.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Furthermore, another subset of holdouts are young, healthy
individuals at little risk of a severe case. It may still be a good idea for fit
people under 30 to get vaccinated, but their refusal is not exactly an act of
self-immolation. In short, the number of holdouts who are in dire need of the
vaccine is small, and a mandate will force people at much less risk to bear the
brunt of the coercion.</p><p class="MsoNormal">The second argument advanced by mandate proponents is that
the population as a whole benefits greatly from mass Covid vaccination even if
the individual benefit is small. When the vaccines were first rolled out, there
was hope that they could produce the sterilizing immunity needed to block Covid
transmission. But now we know they do not. Even high rates of vaccination
cannot stop waves of Covid infections from washing over countries on a largely
seasonal basis. <a href="https://www.science.org/content/article/grim-warning-israel-vaccination-blunts-does-not-defeat-delta">Israel</a>
was one of the first countries to experience a post-vaccination wave, and other
countries have followed suit. In the U.S., <a href="https://vtdigger.org/2021/11/09/covid-case-rates-are-at-record-level-right-now-with-no-decline-in-sight/">high-vaccination
northern states</a> thought they might be immune to the misleadingly-named “pandemic
of the unvaccinated” in the south, but now their winter wave is arriving right
on schedule, causing some of their worst infection rates since Covid began. “Herd
immunity may well be impossible even if every single American gets a shot,” <i>The Atlantic</i> recently <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/11/what-americas-covid-goal-now/620572/">acknowledged</a>.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Although mandates will not stop the spread, proponents say
they will still preserve hospital capacity by reducing severe cases. But early fears
that Covid patients would lay dying outside of overflowing ERs never came to
pass, even before vaccines and antibody treatments were developed to make it
even less likely. In addition, we have already seen that most vaccine holdouts
are not in the high-risk groups that produce the bulk of severe cases.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Since the case for a broad-based Covid vaccine mandate is so
weak, why do the calls for it persist? The illusion of control has biased the
thinking of public health officials since the beginning of the pandemic. These
officials are searching for something -- anything – to be the next button to
press or lever to pull to control the virus. We might admire their quixotic
project, except that all those buttons and levers have caused severe social
disruptions. Their coercive mandates are yet another escalation.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-2464431918091015622021-09-15T12:13:00.001-04:002021-09-15T12:13:33.074-04:00Normalcy now<p>[originally posted at <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/normalcy-now/">National Review</a>]</p><p></p><p class="MsoNormal">On Thursday President Biden unveiled yet another plan to
“beat the pandemic,” following up on his campaign pledge to “shut down the
virus.” It’s time to retire this eliminationist thinking. Over the last several
months, the Covid endgame has become increasingly clear: The virus gradually reaches
an endemic state in which most of us are exposed. That’s it. No intervention –
not lockdown, not masking, not “test and trace,” and <a href="https://www.science.org/news/2021/08/grim-warning-israel-vaccination-blunts-does-not-defeat-delta">not
even the vaccine</a> – has been able to stop Covid’s long march.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Whatever influence the interventions may have on viral
spread, it is clearly not enough to prevent major waves of infection from
washing over the country, region by region, on a largely seasonal basis. We
have 18 months’ worth of proof. That’s why I’m uninterested in debating the
quality of that Bangladeshi mask study, or poring over infection trends in
states with different indoor capacity rules, or arguing whether
self-quarantines should be 10 days or 14 days. Why fight over interventions
that are marginal at best? They do not change Covid’s basic pattern, which is a
series of seasonal waves that will continue until infection has become
sufficiently widespread.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So although we have no choice about the endpoint, we do have
a choice about how we get there. We can keep on masking and distancing and
quarantining and tut-tutting at people who congregate in large groups, or we
can return to normal life as the virus completes its pandemic phase. I vote for
normal life.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Accepting the inevitable is difficult for many people,
perhaps because Covid has earned such a frightful reputation. But
pharmaceuticals have rendered the virus much less dangerous than it was in 2020.
Vaccines taken prior to infection prevent most severe cases, and infusions of monoclonal
antibodies, received soon after infection, appear to be quite effective as
well.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Even some people who understand the low risk associated with
a typical Covid case are still reluctant to accept that their own infection is forthcoming.
The restrictions themselves deserve some blame here. When a mere positive test requires
quarantine and awkward calls to friends and colleagues, it’s understandable
that people will take extraordinary measures to avoid it. In that sense, the
restrictions are self-reinforcing. Infection is even seen as shameful in some
circles, as if it is some kind of personal failing. It’s time to put that all
behind us.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The public health establishment does not agree, of course.
They have volunteered no specific endpoint for the restrictions, and it’s fair
to assume that none is imminent. “If endemicity is the future, then masks,
distancing, and other precautions merely delay exposure to the virus—and to
what end?” Ed Yong asked in a <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/08/delta-has-changed-pandemic-endgame/619726/">piece</a>
for the <i>Atlantic</i> last month. The
answer, the public-health advocates told him, is “to buy time.”</p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">That answer is not persuasive. First of all, how much time
is actually available to purchase? As noted above, no intervention has
prevented major surges from coming and going at seasonally predictable points
in various parts of the country. At best these interventions may have shortened
waves, but they did not prevent them. That’s why the most plausible reason to
buy time – to prevent hospital overruns – is still unconvincing. Hospitals have
been stressed for sure, but the early fear that untreated patients would be
dying outside of overflowing ERs never came to pass. With the pharmaceutical
treatments available now, it’s hard to believe it ever will.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Other reasons given to Yong for buying time are even less
convincing. One is “to keep schools open,” but it is the restrictions
themselves that threaten to close schools. Here again the mitigation strategies
seem self-reinforcing: We have to <a href="https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/nearly-850-dc-public-school-students-in-quarantine/2795413/">quarantine
students</a> and close schools at the first sign of an outbreak, because
otherwise infections might spread, and then we’d have to... quarantine students
and close schools. Once we acknowledge that infection is inevitable, schools
are in fact one of the most obvious places to restore normal operations. If we
cannot accept that the lowest-risk demographic group (students) will be exposed
to the virus, then we are not ready to accept reality at all.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Other justifications for buying time include studying breakthrough
infections, further encouraging the vaccine stragglers, and giving hospital
workers a break. These are useful goals, but few people outside of public
health will believe they are of such importance that they justify preventing a
return to normal life. This is one reason that elected leaders should never
transfer decision-making authority to public-health advocates. Such advocates
have important contributions to make, but they cannot be expected to balance
competing interests in the same way that the people’s representatives do.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The public health establishment will always be inclined to
ask for more time for its own priorities. Sometimes – like now -- we have to
say no. If we are not able to acknowledge the inevitable and recover our
freedoms in this moment, I fear we never will.</p><p></p>Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-43298807222308491972021-07-15T08:08:00.002-04:002021-07-15T08:08:47.722-04:00New Parsing Immigration Policy podcast episodeI joined Mark Krikorian to discuss my "<a href="https://cis.org/Report/No-Americans-Need-Apply">No Americans Need Apply</a>" report and other matters related to the labor market impact of immigration. Listen <a href="https://cis.org/Parsing-Immigration-Policy/Evidence-Immigrants-Reduce-Wages-and-Job-Opportunities-LowSkill">here</a>.Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-57301066465700731592021-04-26T18:16:00.000-04:002021-04-26T18:16:33.366-04:00In memoriam: Jim Steinman<p>For a brief period in the early 1990s, I was interested in
VH-1’s weekly ranking of music videos. One video that hovered near the top of
the charts at that time was Meat Loaf’s “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3Iay1J87x4">Rock and Roll Dreams Come
Through</a>.” It initially caught my eye for its high production quality --
including an early appearance by Angelina Jolie! -- but the song itself grew on
me. It was an extravagant paean to rock and roll with several memorable lines,
including, “You’re never alone ‘cause you can put on the ‘phones and let the
drummer tell your heart what to do.” </p><p>The song was a single from <i>Bat Out of Hell II</i>, which became one of the first albums I would
ever buy. The whole thing was amazing. And it turned out that the original <i>Bat Out of Hell</i> was even more amazing --
long and complex melodies, elaborate arrangements, over-the-top lyrics, Meat
Loaf’s powerful voice -- it was rock opera at its finest.</p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0zwvMWDha_A7knnEWQ3jCR-lXZdmKKwNuSYkHPEgInjrwZsfqcBDXpFg7HKNO5EbdghAI7qhEEpXUyMeXssqFtWJLQ7GQsMAGcSisDT1fJtDbeJ6GyGIQgO8R1M4iGkFyKZ22jHbkybs/" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="383" data-original-width="681" height="180" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0zwvMWDha_A7knnEWQ3jCR-lXZdmKKwNuSYkHPEgInjrwZsfqcBDXpFg7HKNO5EbdghAI7qhEEpXUyMeXssqFtWJLQ7GQsMAGcSisDT1fJtDbeJ6GyGIQgO8R1M4iGkFyKZ22jHbkybs/" width="320" /></a></div><p></p><p>In the pre-Internet era, it wasn’t easy to learn the stories
behind these albums. I remember being confused by the lengthy time gap between <i>Bat I</i> (1977) and <i>Bat II</i> (1993). As I bought more Meat Loaf albums from the 1980s, it
became obvious to me that the quality was largely dictated by whether the songs
were written by a guy named Jim Steinman. Both <i>Bats</i> had “Songs by Jim Steinman” featured prominently on the covers,
and 1981’s <i>Dead Ringer</i> was also
written entirely by Steinman. But other Meat Loaf albums featured only a couple
of Steinman songs, and sometimes none at all. To be frank, most of Meat Loaf’s
non-Steinman songs sucked. They didn’t even sound like Meat Loaf songs. Why did
he bother singing without Steinman?</p><p>I learned later about the falling out that the two had.
Accounts differ, but the basic story is that they were unprepared for the
success of <i>Bat I</i>. Meat Loaf in
particular did not handle it well. He strained his voice with excessive
touring, abused drugs and alcohol, and became an all-around wreck. When it came
time to record <i>Renegade Angel</i>, the
new album Steinman had written for him, Meat Loaf was unable to do it. Some
combination of burnout, drugs, and anxiety had affected his voice.</p><p>At the same time, Steinman felt slighted by the attention
lavished on the guy who sang his songs. These were <i>his</i> songs, not Meat Loaf’s. In fact, in Steinman’s view, he essentially
created the whole Meat Loaf persona that audiences saw on stage. He thought the
album should have been credited to “Meat Loaf and Steinman,” or something to
that effect, but instead he had to settle for “Songs by....”</p><p>Steinman decided to stop waiting for Meat Loaf to recover
his voice. He completed the songs himself and released the album under his own
name, with the new title <i>Bad For Good</i>.
Steinman’s voice was <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQ85WU-Z1oQ">decent</a>,
but it was unsuited to the bombastic songs that he wrote. He lacked the power
and the range to pull them off. In fact, despite Steinman’s top billing, the
lead vocals on the album were often handled by Rory Dodd, Steinman’s longtime demo
and backup vocalist who could hit the high notes but still lacked Meat Loaf’s
power.</p><p>Despite the vocal problems, <i>Bad for Good</i> is proof of Steinman’s independent genius. In essence,
he made a Meat Loaf album without Meat Loaf. Everything is in the same style as
the <i>Bat</i> albums, from the cover art to
the arrangements. Even the vocal inflections we hear from Steinman/Dodd evoke
Meat Loaf. The only thing missing was the quality of Meat Loaf’s actual voice. No
offense intended against Meat Loaf here, but it’s obvious that Steinman was the
main creative force in their partnership.</p><p>That became more evident with their diverging careers in the
1980s. While Meat Loaf recorded some forgettable albums with other writers, Steinman
kept penning hits -- Bonnie Tyler’s “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSeFxzeo5Ts">Total Eclipse Of The Heart</a>,”
Air Supply’s “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEd6QUbK2Mw">Making Love
Out Of Nothing At All</a>,” Barry Manilow’s “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUtDL_mIA4c">Read ‘Em And Weep</a>,” and Celine
Dion’s “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsWG2Gry1fw">It’s All Coming
Back To Me Now</a>.” The first two songs on that list were simultaneously Billboard’s
#1 and #2 songs, respectively, for four weeks in 1983. Rolling Stone <a href="https://jimsteinman.com/charts.htm">called it</a> “Steinman’s total
eclipse of the charts.”</p><p>Steinman’s success with singles is all the more remarkable
given his penchant for long, operatic songs. Most of them had to be cut down for
radio play, and it didn’t always work. For example, one of my favorite Steinman
compositions is Bonnie Tyler’s “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awPrp-wDLZQ">Loving You’s A Dirty Job</a>,”
but it’s not the kind of song that can be fully appreciated on a first listen.
In fact, it feels like two different songs mashed together, and it takes
several hearings to get a feel for what Steinman was going for. I can see how
it didn’t play well on the radio.</p><p>When Steinman reunited with Meat Loaf for <i>Bat II</i>, he wrote four new songs, led by
the megahit “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cnPZSM85j8">I’d Do Anything
For Love</a>.” Meat Loaf also performed older Steinman material for the album,
including “Rock and Roll Dreams Come Through,” which first appeared on Steinman’s
own <i>Bad for Good</i>. It seemed fitting
that Meat Loaf could finally sing these words:</p>
<i><blockquote>Think of how we'd lay down together<br />We'd be listening to the radio so loud and so strong <br />Every golden nugget coming like a gift of the gods <br />Someone must have blessed us when he gave us those songs</blockquote>
</i><p class="MsoNormal">Meat Loaf was indeed blessed, as the album rejuvenated his
career. But he and Steinman parted ways again afterward. My sense is that they
were simply at different stages of their careers. Steinman was at the end of his
creative peak, and he wanted to use some of his material in musical theater and
other miscellaneous projects. Meanwhile, Meat Loaf’s voice was as sonorous as
ever, and he was eager to seize on his newfound popularity. When he quickly followed
<i>Bat II</i> with <i>Welcome to the Neighborhood</i>, I was disappointed to see only two
Steinman songs, neither of which was a new composition.</p><p class="MsoNormal">I drifted away from Meat Loaf after that, but I’ve
periodically delved deeper into Steinman’s oeuvre. There is actually a lot more
to appreciate than just the <i>Bat</i>
albums and the big hits. For one thing, there’s 1981’s <i>Dead Ringer</i>, a set of songs that Steinman wrote for Meat Loaf just
before they first parted ways. Steinman’s involvement in the production was
limited, and Meat Loaf’s voice had not fully recovered, but the album still has
some strong tracks, including <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lvwp5KT9LlE">a duet with Cher</a>.</p><p class="MsoNormal">I’ve already mentioned that “Loving You Is A Dirty Job” is
underrated, but all of the songs Steinman wrote for Bonnie Tyler are entertaining.
Once again, they sound <i>a lot</i> like
Meat Loaf songs. It’s like hearing the Meat Loaf albums that never happened in
the 1980s. I especially recommend “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHzzy8WX5sw">Ravishing</a>” and “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1yTMT4VvcI">Faster Than the Speed Of
Night</a>.”</p><p class="MsoNormal">Although almost all of its tracks showed up on later Meat
Loaf albums, Steinman’s own <i>Bad for Good</i>
is still worth a listen, and not just to hear the strange vocals. Some of Meat
Loaf’s <i>Bad for Good</i> covers were not produced
under Steinman’s supervision, and they suffered as a result. For example, despite
his superior vocals, Meat Loaf’s version of “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIJQqvN9TWo">Surf’s Up</a>” was not
arranged well enough to compete with <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mPiizL1Jlc">the original</a>.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Then there’s <i>Original
Sin</i>. It’s a concept album Steinman wrote for a group of no-name singers. Most
of the good tracks have since been covered by more famous artists, but the
album does contain one uncovered and underappreciated song, “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKJilIqDT-o">Safe Sex</a>,” which may
have struggled because the title is misleadingly risqué. (The lyrics are actually
tame.)</p><p class="MsoNormal">And there’s still more. Steinman’s “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVr15gWYUek">Tonight Is What It Means To
Be Young</a>” is a great number from the movie <i>Streets of Fire</i> – it’s great, that is, if you’re prepared for a full
1980s aural immersion. “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFPJdPljUdA">What
Part Of My Body Hurts The Most?</a>” is a nice ballad. “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YlYy8QBxbA">Braver Than We Are</a>” is
epic and haunting.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Now, despite all of my gushing, I sympathize with Steinman’s
critics: There’s a fine line between epic and bombastic on one hand, and repetitive
and bloated on the other. Steinman sometimes found himself on the wrong side of
that line. In the full version of “Total Eclipse of the Heart,” the musical
intro is twice as long as it needs to be, and the “Every now and then...”
verses seem to go on forever. In the 12-minute album cut of “I'd Do Anything
For Love,” there are not one but two sections where a chorus just repeats “I'd
do anything for love, anything you've been dreaming of, but I won't do that”
over and over and over. And if you think “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7WVi-7me4I">Objects In The Rearview
Mirror May Appear Closer Than They Are</a>” is a mouthful of a title, wait
until you hear the line repeated 24 times.</p><p class="MsoNormal">There was a time when I would mentally edit Steinman’s songs
while I listened. If only he would have just cut that, and then moved that
there, and shortened this, and so on. But eventually I learned to love his
music, warts and all. When a genius has a vision, I think it may be best to just
let him try to realize it, even if the finished product isn’t exactly what you
think it should be.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Jim Steinman died last week after many years of poor health.
His personal life remained a mystery to the end. I have never heard him romantically
linked to anyone, and the only survivor the media have been able to identify is
a brother named Bill. I’ve read that his lifestyle followed his music in
tending toward excess. That may be what contributed to his series of strokes
starting at a relatively young age. I wonder what additional music he may have
written if his body would have cooperated. I’m tempted to say he should have
taken better care of himself, but, again, leave geniuses alone.<o:p></o:p></p>Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-42752508010179900812020-07-27T15:38:00.000-04:002020-07-27T15:39:49.550-04:00Open the schools, part 2<div class="tr_bq">
The Baltimore Sun published my <a href="https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/op-ed/bs-ed-op-0507-open-schools-maryland-20200506-rqhcvebhuzf2bhy7jjuha7p63u-story.html">op-ed</a> in May, but it did not run my letter to the editor I submitted 10 days ago. Here is the letter:</div>
<blockquote>
As counties roll out their school re-opening plans, parents have learned that the state will not allow children to attend school five days per week. Apparently the state board of education has decided that five-day school is a Stage Three “high risk” activity on par with events in large entertainment venues. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
That decision is perplexing, as it has no basis in evidence. The research overwhelmingly shows that children are less susceptible to the virus and less likely to transmit it. Schools have opened in Europe with little problem, and elementary schools are especially safe. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
The decision is perplexing for another reason as well: It was never mentioned in Maryland’s “Roadmap to Recovery” or in the model plan from the American Enterprise Institute. Indeed, the ban on five-day school simply does not square with the rest of Maryland policy. For example, according to the Roadmap’s Stage Two rules that we currently live under, adults can make daily trips to the gym where they breathe heavily amidst a varying group of strangers. And yet five-day school is too risky? </blockquote>
<blockquote>
We need a school policy that is both grounded in scientific evidence and consistent with the Roadmap. Right now we have neither. I urge the governor’s office to step in and re-evaluate.</blockquote>
<div>
<br /></div>
Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-77676812100300701092020-07-15T11:46:00.000-04:002020-07-15T11:46:17.307-04:00Open the schoolsBack in May, I wrote a <a href="https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/op-ed/bs-ed-op-0507-open-schools-maryland-20200506-rqhcvebhuzf2bhy7jjuha7p63u-story.html">piece</a> for the Baltimore Sun lamenting the closure of schools in my home state of Maryland. I remained hopeful for the fall, but now Maryland seems to have moved five-day-per-week school into a third-stage "high risk" category that includes events at large entertainment venues. This decision has no rational basis.<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br />
What follows is the public comment I submitted to the school board after it announced that students will attend only two days per week. It's a bit of a rush-job, but I think it gets the main points across:<br />
<br />
<br />
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Board’s plan
for school re-opening. As a father of two school-age children, <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">I respectfully ask that you consider</b> <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">a more normal school schedule – five days
per week, with no masks required for children</b>.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
In reading through the guidelines published by the state and
the county, I am concerned that the Board<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>may be so focused on logistics that it has lost sight of the big-picture
evidence. I will try to summarize that evidence here:<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: "symbol"; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">·<span style="font: 7.0pt "Times New Roman";">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Children
are far less susceptible to COVID-19. <o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 20.5pt;">
The rate of school-age
Marylanders who have been <a href="https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/covidnet/COVID19_3.html">hospitalized</a> with
COVID-19 is less than six in 100,000, compared to 480 in 100,000 among the
elderly. Moreover, out of the 3,202 Marylanders whose deaths have been
attributed to the virus as of July 14, only <a href="https://coronavirus.maryland.gov/">one</a> – a 15-year-old in Baltimore
-- was under the age of 20.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 20.5pt;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 20.5pt;">
Children are also less likely to
spread the virus to others. The evidence “consistently demonstrates reduced
infection and infectivity of children in the transmission chain,” <a href="https://dontforgetthebubbles.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/COVID-data-top-10.pdf"><span style="mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;">according</span></a> to The Royal
College of Pediatrics and Child Health in the United Kingdom. Reports from
Denmark and Sweden <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/07/parents-need-facts-kids-covid-19/613744/">find</a>
that teachers are not at a high risk of exposure compared to other occupational
groups.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: "symbol"; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">·<span style="font: 7.0pt "Times New Roman";">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">School
closures have minimal effect on viral spread. </b><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
“Currently, the evidence to support national closure of schools to combat
COVID-19 is very weak,” according to a recent <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanchi/article/PIIS2352-4642(20)30095-X/fulltext">review</a>
in The Lancet, which went on to note that “school closures could have
relatively small effects” given the characteristics of COVID-19. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
“We found no evidence that school closures influenced the growth rate in
confirmed COVID-19 cases,” according to a more recent <a href="https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00608">study</a>
in Health Affairs.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: "symbol"; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">·<span style="font: 7.0pt "Times New Roman";">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Elementary
schools are especially safe.<o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
Schools have <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/schools-reopening-coronavirus/2020/07/10/865fb3e6-c122-11ea-8908-68a2b9eae9e0_story.html">opened</a>
in Europe with little problem. Some isolated outbreaks have occurred in
secondary schools, but not elementary schools. If school attendance must be
restricted, the restrictions should be on the upper grades only. I can think of
no reason why elementary students should be subject to the same rules as high
school students.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: "symbol"; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">·<span style="font: 7.0pt "Times New Roman";">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">If adults
can go to indoor gyms, children can go to school.</b><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
Given
the evidence above, it is entirely inappropriate to classify five-day school as
a third-stage “high risk” activity on par with events in large entertainment
venues. A group of 20 to 30 children in a classroom is simply not comparable to
thousands of adults crowded together indoors. Even second-stage “medium risk”
activities that are currently allowed, such as indoor fitness classes, are
likely to be far more risky than operating a classroom five days per week.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: "symbol"; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">·<span style="font: 7.0pt "Times New Roman";">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Masks
impede learning.</b> <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
Masks are uncomfortable, distracting, and potentially dangerous if not worn
properly and cleaned regularly. More importantly, schools are social
environments where children learn to interact with each other. Masks block that
key interchange by concealing facial expressions. “Face masks are not required
or recommended for children returning to school,” according to official <a href="https://www.sickkids.ca/AboutSickKids/Newsroom/Past-News/2020/covid19-recommendations-school-reopening.html">guidance</a>
from the Hospital for Sick Children.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: "symbol"; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">·<span style="font: 7.0pt "Times New Roman";">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Maryland’s
virus situation has improved since early summer.</b><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 20.5pt;">
Since the Board made its decision
on June 17 to pursue a two-day-per-week plan, hospitalizations for COVID-19
have dropped from 702 to 415. ICU beds devoted to COVID-19 patients have fallen
by more than half, from 283 to 118. Positive test rates are now consistently
under 5 percent. In short, the state has become far better equipped to contain
the virus than it was earlier in the summer.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>School plans should be adjusted to reflect this progress.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 20.5pt;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: "symbol"; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">·<span style="font: 7.0pt "Times New Roman";">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Calvert can
be more open than the average Maryland county.<o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 2.5pt;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 20.5pt;">
As a low-density, semi-rural
county, Calvert is naturally less susceptible to viral spread than other parts
of Maryland. The mortality rate here is 4.5 times lower than the state as a
whole. The 11 Calvert residents who have died with COVID-19 were all age-55 or
over and had “<a href="https://www.calverthealth.org/healththreats/diseases/cvirus.htm">at least
one chronic health condition</a>.” <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 20.5pt;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 20.5pt;">
I understand that you are bound
to some extent by state guidelines. However, the Roadmap to Recovery advises
that “some regional (or county-by-county) approaches may be contemplated as the
recovery moves forward.” The Board should try to work with the state to develop
a more flexible policy on school re-openings for the less-risky counties.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left: 20.5pt; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: "symbol"; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">·<span style="font: 7.0pt "Times New Roman";">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Children will
mix together anyway on non-school days.<o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 20.5pt;">
Many children will attend daycare
on the days that they do not go to school. At daycare they will mix with
children who are not part of their two-day school rotation group, reducing the
effectiveness of the split-week approach for viral containment.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Again, thank you for your consideration of these points.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Jason Richwine<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<br />Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-72184625584438477592020-03-12T10:06:00.000-04:002020-03-12T10:06:17.321-04:00New report on the fiscal impact of refugee resettlement<div class="tr_bq">
I have a <a href="https://cis.org/Report/Fiscal-Impact-Refugee-Resettlement">new report</a> out this month debunking the notion that refugee resettlement in the U.S. is a "win-win" in the sense of costing taxpayers nothing for their humanitarian gesture. From the introduction:</div>
<blockquote>
Advocates of expanding the number of refugees admitted to the United States have lately portrayed their position as a win-win — refugee resettlement not only assists the refugees themselves, it also allegedly improves our nation's fiscal health. The fiscal claim is unsupportable. Although refugees from earlier generations were often well educated, today's refugees have fewer than nine years of schooling on average. Because of their low earning power and immediate access to welfare benefits, recent refugees cost the government substantially more than they contribute in taxes, even over the long term. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
Our best estimate of the average refugee's lifetime fiscal cost, expressed as a net present value, is $60,000, with those entering as adults (ages 25 to 64) costing $133,000 each. Perhaps this is a price that the United States should be willing to pay to further its humanitarian goals. However, resettlement in the United States may not be the most cost-effective means of aiding displaced people.</blockquote>
Read the whole thing <a href="https://cis.org/Report/Fiscal-Impact-Refugee-Resettlement">here</a>.Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-34086508233180124502019-10-30T08:15:00.000-04:002019-10-30T08:15:13.199-04:00New report and video on employment discrimination against U.S. workers<div class="tr_bq">Last Thursday I published a new report through the Center for Immigration Studies called "<a href="https://cis.org/Report/EEOC-lawsuits-native-immigrant">No Americans Need Apply</a>." CIS hosted a panel event the same day featuring myself, Peter Kirsanow, and Kevin Lynn. Excerpts from the report and the event are below.</div><blockquote>This report examines real-world case studies of the negative effects of immigration on the labor market. The source of these cases is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which for about two decades has been uncovering evidence that U.S. companies actively seek to replace low-skill native workers with immigrants. A sample of EEOC cases, presented in rough chronological order below, paints a disturbing picture of how low-skill American workers — typically black, but sometimes white as well — are systematically passed over for manual labor jobs in favor of Hispanics, who are usually foreign-born in the regions where these cases predominate. </blockquote><blockquote>Of course, no set of EEOC cases, no matter how consistent and extensive, is ironclad proof that immigration negatively affects low-skill natives as a group. Nevertheless, the cases reveal that at least in certain regions and certain industries, natives certainly do lose. And if the anti-native mindset among U.S. employers is as widespread as these cases suggest, the number of losers could be large.</blockquote><br />
<iframe width=480" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/0DUTn2D8i_A" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
<br />
Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-198761104732149852019-10-13T20:56:00.003-04:002019-10-13T20:56:59.766-04:00New report and event video on immigrant healthcare costsI published a new CIS report this week entitled, "<a href="https://cis.org/Report/Cost-Immigrant-Medicaid-Coverage-Under-Current-Policy">The Cost of Immigrant Medicaid Coverage Under Current Policy</a>," which establishes the context for proposals to possibly expand eligibility to include illegal immigrants. CIS also put together an event at the National Press Club. Here's my short talk:<br />
<br />
<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Ch1ktcStrLM" width="480"></iframe>Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-51218548855735234592019-09-24T07:43:00.002-04:002019-09-24T07:43:59.817-04:00"The truth about teacher pay" published in National AffairsTop billing! I can't recall that happening before. The <a href="https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-truth-about-teacher-pay">full text</a> is available ungated. Here's a preview:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
...[A]n inordinate focus on teacher salaries feeds unrealistic expectations for the profession. Although teacher quality certainly matters, most of the variance in student achievement is associated with factors outside the classroom. Just as current teachers should not be blamed for "failing schools," policymakers should not simply assume that investing heavily in teacher salaries is worth the political and economic costs. The most prudent course would be to implement modest structural reforms, while de-emphasizing the level of teacher pay as a focal point of education reform.</blockquote>
Please <a href="https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-truth-about-teacher-pay">read the whole thing</a>. This means you, journalist who is tempted to uncritically cite the Economic Policy Institute's "teacher pay gap."<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/71152542_10109333928389481_4405302828285820928_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&_nc_oc=AQlOMjFGbksLIlmR54nn0Mn9apHPUANANseF043TMku_QNZ7-scoUsGt8JPGmtBOHq0&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=bb13700fe621e7861be6b46956cd09fd&oe=5DF4264C" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="No photo description available." border="0" src="https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/71152542_10109333928389481_4405302828285820928_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&_nc_oc=AQlOMjFGbksLIlmR54nn0Mn9apHPUANANseF043TMku_QNZ7-scoUsGt8JPGmtBOHq0&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=bb13700fe621e7861be6b46956cd09fd&oe=5DF4264C" /></a></div>
Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-22851472210216727862019-09-01T21:47:00.000-04:002019-09-20T09:57:14.282-04:00Justice on Trial reviewedI followed Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation process rather closely - closely enough that I could write <a href="http://www.jasonrichwine.com/2018/10/kavanaugh-coda.html">a 2,500-word treatise</a> explaining that the assault charges against him were almost certainly false, and that his opponents' refusal to engage with the evidence was alarming. Still, I learned a lot from Mollie Hemingway and Carrie Severino's new book, <i>Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court</i>. Hemingway is a journalist, and Severino helps lead the Judicial Crisis Network, which supports the confirmation of conservative judges. Their book supplements the familiar narrative of the confirmation fight with a lot of behind-the-scenes material from the Kavanaugh camp.<br />
<br />
I'll just mention a couple of their revelations here. First, the yearbook from Holton-Arms (where Christine Ford went to school) was at least as embarrassing as Georgetown Prep's (where Kavanaugh went to school), with many references to sexuality and drunkenness. Classmates report that Ford was personally very much into both. Despite having this information, Kavanaugh's team declined to publicize it, fearing a backlash. That may have been a wise strategy, but the double standard is glaring. Both the media and the Democrats on the Judiciary Committee had no compunction about digging into Kavanaugh's drinking habits, his sexual habits, his friends'<i> </i>drinking and sexual habits, and the overall culture at Georgetown Prep. Their position was that if Kavanaugh was a heavy drinker who objectified girls, he may have blacked out or simply not remembered what he did to Ford. And yet a similar argument could be made about Ford. If she was a heavy drinker who fooled around with lots of boys, her memory could have been impaired, and unrelated incidents could blur together in her mind. Maybe these insinuations are unfair, but there is no reason that only the accuser -- and not the accused -- should be protected from them.<br />
<br />
A second revelation is that Leland Keyser's testimony to the FBI went further in exonerating Kavanaugh than her testimony to the Judiciary Committee did. Keyser is Ford's longtime friend and the only girl whom Ford placed at the party. When Keyser told the committee that she could not remember any such party, and that in fact she did not know Kavanaugh at all, it was devastating to Ford's case. (Or at least it should have been.) A public and private pressure campaign began among Ford allies to convince Keyser to say something supportive. In a second statement to the committee, Keyser reiterated that she had no memory of Kavanaugh, but that she nevertheless believed Ford's accusation. According to Hemingway and Severino, Keyser had the opportunity to think through her activities in the summer of 1983 in more detail during the FBI investigation. She requested a second interview with the FBI, in which she stated that she no longer believed Ford's story, as it simply wasn't plausible that she (Keyser) attended such a party at that time.<br />
<br />
Keyser's FBI testimony was supposed to be for senators' eyes only, so it's not clear how the authors know the details of it. One of my longstanding problems with journalism is that we're asked to trust the word of reporters, who are in turn probably trusting the word of anonymous sources. I've seen <a href="http://www.jasonrichwine.com/p/the-controversy-that-erupted-around-my.html">too many instances of mangled facts</a> in order for me to take anything on faith, but this story about Keyser, <i>if true</i>, is even more devastating to Ford than the public evidence. It's also even more damning of the Democratic senators who still insist that Kavanaugh is guilty.<br />
<br />
[<i>Update 9/19/2019</i>: Leland Keyser has now <a href="https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/15/new-book-christine-blasey-fords-friend-leland-keyser-doesnt-believe/">spoken on the record</a> to a pair of New York Times reporters, confirming what <i>Justice on Trial</i> initially reported about her FBI testimony.]<br />
<br />
Hemingway and Severino offer an inspiring message near the end of their book. They profile a liberal lawyer whose friends abandoned her because she vouched for Kavanaugh's character:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
If she has lost friends, she views it as their loss....Imagine a world where fewer people were scared to stand up for what they believed. It could start a virtuous circle, in which every person who bucked the popular views would drive down the cost of standing up.</blockquote>
I <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/brett-kavanaugh-thank-you/">offered</a> similar sentiments after Kavanaugh's powerful testimony refuting Ford's allegation: "Bravery is not something that the Republican establishment is known for. With the force of his arguments, Brett Kavanaugh may have changed that. We should all follow his example."<br />
<br />
In an otherwise great book, I did find one weak section. Citing two studies, the authors write, "A small but significant portion of sexual assault allegations -- between 2 and 10 percent, according to empirical studies -- are eventually deemed false." This empirical claim is misleading without more context. One might think the quoted numbers imply at least 90 percent of rape allegations are true, but that is emphatically not the case. Nearly half of the rape allegations in the first study they cite "did not proceed," meaning no truth determination was made either way. For more details, see <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/how-common-are-false-rape-charges-really-jason-richwine/">this post</a> I did for National Review.Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-76086514064401149512019-08-20T21:21:00.000-04:002019-08-20T21:21:16.761-04:00New piece in Quillette: Free speech is about more than the First AmendmentI'm pleased to appear in <i>Quillette</i> this week on a topic that I had been wanting to write about for a long time -- namely, the importance of recognizing free speech as a cultural value rather than simply a restraint on the government. The <a href="https://quillette.com/2019/08/18/free-speech-matters-even-when-its-not-protected-by-the-first-amendment/">piece</a> has received a decent amount of attention. From the conclusion:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
When responding to speech we don’t like, a useful guideline is to ask ourselves, “Am I disagreeing, or am I <i>retaliating</i>? Am I trying to persuade, or am I trying to <i>silence</i>?” If retaliation or silencing is the goal, remember that such techniques will ultimately be used not just on “bad” speech, but on “good” speech, as well. And when people refrain from speaking because they fear personal retribution from corporations, the media, academia, or an unruly Twitter mob, the value of their speech is lost—lost in the same way it would be if the government threatened them with punishment.</blockquote>
<a href="https://quillette.com/" rel="home" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; clear: right; color: #191919; float: right; font-family: "libre baskerville", georgia, serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em; margin-top: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><img alt="" height="45" scale="0" src="https://d24fkeqntp1r7r.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/16053246/cropped-logo.png" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; max-width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" width="200" /></a>Read the whole thing <a href="https://quillette.com/2019/08/18/free-speech-matters-even-when-its-not-protected-by-the-first-amendment/">there</a>.<br />
<br />Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-74859837956412377472019-05-23T16:03:00.001-04:002019-05-29T07:14:29.103-04:00The College Board’s “adversity score” perpetuates the myth of SAT bias[I originally wrote this <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-college-boards-adversity-score-perpetuates-the-myth-of-sat-bias/">for NR</a>, but I'm reposting here because this perspective has not received enough attention.]<br />
<br />
[Update: I wrote <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/sat-test-adversity-score-debate/">another piece</a> addressing similar misinformation about the SAT.]<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
A common defense of affirmative action in college admissions is that it simply adjusts for difficult childhood circumstances. Under this theory, students from underrepresented groups score below their true ability level on the SAT due to poverty or discrimination or a lack of fancy test prep, but they will thrive once brought to an enriching university environment. If true, affirmative action would not involve any lowering of admission standards, but rather a fairer appraisal of each applicant’s abilities.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
It’s not true. Researchers have known <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1978.tb01166.x">for</a> <a href="https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED582459.pdf">decades</a> that SAT scores predict college performance for poor and minority students about as well as they do for everyone else. To the extent there is a difference, the SAT actually <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">over</i>-predicts their performance. Therefore, if the goal is to find the students who will be most academically successful, colleges should not bump up applicants’ SAT scores on the basis of poverty or race.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
That’s one reason why the College Board’s new “adversity score” is so troubling. By providing schools with a secret quantification of each applicant’s childhood environment, the College Board furthers the myth that the SAT is predictively biased along socioeconomic lines. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/16/us/sat-score.html">According to the <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">New York Times</i></a>: <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in;">
Admissions officers have also tried for years to find ways to gauge the hardships that students have had to overcome, and to predict which students will do well in college despite lower test scores. The new adversity score is meant to be one such gauge.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
If so, we already know it doesn’t work. The College Board’s <a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.guidebook.com/upload/102712/xb1jRCIejfKg2Q6Pkgt9IUOzMitXuNx4IFiB.pdf">own data</a> (see page 42) show that test scores and high school grades predict college performance about equally across all adversity levels. An exception is for students at the highest levels of adversity where, once again, their college GPA is slightly <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">below</i> expectations, not above. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
In reality, there is no merit-based case for affirmative action in college admissions. Proponents should acknowledge that their chief interest is not merit, but social justice. “Diversity is so important to our schools and to broader society that lowering standards is a worthy price to pay,” they should declare. That would be a reminder that affirmative action – like all hotly-debated issues –involves inherent trade-offs, and it’s up to the public to decide how to weigh them.<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-76685369320536928052019-05-05T10:15:00.000-04:002019-05-05T12:50:45.091-04:00Sign the petition for Dr. Noah CarlFree speech is about more than just the First Amendment's limitation on government power. It's a principle that should underlie all political discourse. When institutions that promote themselves as open platforms banish those with whom they disagree, it has the same kind of chilling effect as government censorship.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Academic freedom is an especially important subset of free speech. If universities place limitations on what academics can study, whole areas of knowledge could be closed off. That's why I signed <a href="https://quillette.com/2019/05/02/cambridge-capitulates-to-the-mob-and-fires-a-young-scholar">the petition for Dr. Noah Carl,</a> and it's why you should, too. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Remember, when a mob demands censorship, it's easy to hope that capitulating "just this one time" will make the problem go away. It won't. It will only lead to more severe demands for censorship in the future. </div>
Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-15240878375774633092019-03-04T08:54:00.002-05:002019-03-04T08:54:43.332-05:00Video of event with Michelle MalkinIt went well. The transcript and all videos can be found <a href="https://cis.org/Video/Panel-Value-Foreign-Diplomas">here</a>. I've embedded my section below. (If you read the transcript or watch the unedited video from Facebook, you'll note a few strange interjections. We were having a problem with the computer screen flickering.)<br />
<br />
<iframe width="480" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/PKq00q8Dc3Q" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-77605664109731984982019-02-26T15:29:00.001-05:002019-02-26T15:29:19.160-05:00Panel event with Michelle Malkin<div class="tr_bq">
On Friday, March 1, at 4:00 pm at the National Press Club, I'll be <a href="https://cis.org/Press-Release/Panel-Value-Foreign-Diplomas">appearing on a panel</a> with Michelle Malkin. We''ll be discussing high-skill immigration, and the starting point will be my new report discussed in the previous post. Admission is free, and there will be food provided, so please come.</div>
<br />
<blockquote>
WASHINGTON, D.C. (February 26, 2019) – The Center for Immigration Studies will host a panel discussion and reception Friday, March 1 focusing on the impact of immigration on skilled workers and the value of a foreign vs. domestic diploma. The starting point for conversation will be the recent report by independent policy analyst Jason Richwine which compared the skill levels of foreign-educated immigrants and native-born Americans. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
REPORT: Foreign-Educated Immigrants Are Less Skilled Than U.S. Degree Holders<br />WHAT: Panel discussion on the value of foreign college degrees and the reality behind "high-skill" immigration </blockquote>
<blockquote>
WHEN: Friday, March 1, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
WHERE: National Press Club, Murrow Room, 529 14th St NW, Washington, D.C. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
STREAM: Facebook Live </blockquote>
<blockquote>
WHO: </blockquote>
<blockquote>
MICHELLE MALKIN </blockquote>
<blockquote>
Michelle Malkin is a nationally syndicated commentator and co-author of the 2015 book "Sold Out", which explores the effects of current immigration policies on American skilled workers. In the book, which she co-authored with CIS Fellow John Miano, she writes, "There is nothing special about the hundreds of thousands of H-1B visa holders flooding our workforce. Most are sponsored by companies that specialize in outsourcing of U.S. jobs." </blockquote>
<blockquote>
JASON RICHWINE </blockquote>
<blockquote>
Jason Richwine is an independent public policy analyst based in Washington D.C. and the author of the recent report, "Foreign-Educated Immigrants Are Less Skilled Than U.S. Degree Holders." In it, Richwine demonstrates that supposedly "high-skill" foreign-educated immigrants drastically under-perform native-born Americans with comparable degrees in various standardized exams.</blockquote>
Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-12428389114576154282019-02-25T16:11:00.001-05:002019-02-25T16:11:24.496-05:00Highly-Educated Immigration ≠ Highly-Skilled ImmigrationI have <a href="https://cis.org/Report/ForeignEducated-Immigrants-Are-Less-Skilled-US-Degree-Holders">a new report</a> out this week with a self-explanatory title, "Foreign-Educated Immigrants Are Less Skilled Than U.S. Degree Holders." Here's the summary chart:<br />
<br />
<table style="background-color: white; border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; width: 90%px;"><tbody style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<tr style="box-sizing: border-box;"><td style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 5px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; text-align: center;">
<img alt="Graph: Percentile Scores by Test-Takers with College or Advanced Degrees" src="https://cis.org/sites/default/files/2019-02/richwine-aliens-less-skilled-st.jpg" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; max-width: 100%; vertical-align: middle;" /></div>
</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br /><div>
And here's the conclusion:</div>
<div>
<blockquote>
Although skilled immigration may be desirable, policy-makers must be cautious in using foreign degrees as proof of those skills. This report has shown that immigrants with foreign degrees perform substantially worse than U.S. degree holders on tests of literacy, numeracy, and computer operations. In some cases, the gaps are so large that immigrants with foreign college degrees have skills that resemble those of natives who have only a high school diploma. Although poor English clearly plays a role in the disparity — and a command of English is essential for success in most high-skill occupations in the United States — the disparity persists even among immigrants who have had at least five years to learn English after arriving. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
In Congress, some proposed immigration reforms acknowledge the greater value of U.S. degrees. For example, the RAISE Act would establish a points system for high-skill immigrants that prioritizes U.S. degrees over foreign degrees. It would also go beyond educational credentials by giving extra points for English fluency, STEM specialties, and pre-arranged employment. Ultimately, policy-makers should consider making skill selection even more direct. Universities, the foreign service, and the military have been using standardized testing for decades to evaluate applicants. For example, people who want to do advanced study in important subjects such as biology, chemistry, and physics need to take the Graduate Record Exam (GRE) to demonstrate their knowledge and preparation. Perhaps Congress could integrate similar tests into a truly high-skill immigration system.</blockquote>
Please <a href="https://cis.org/Report/ForeignEducated-Immigrants-Are-Less-Skilled-US-Degree-Holders">read the whole thing</a>. </div>
Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-60981134113914436232019-02-21T07:48:00.000-05:002019-02-21T07:49:22.363-05:00The threat to English<div class="tr_bq">
My <a href="https://amgreatness.com/2019/02/20/the-threat-to-english/">first piece</a> for American Greatness is out today. It deals with the issue of language assimilation. A sample:</div>
<blockquote>
For decades, immigration enthusiasts have offered conflicting assurances to skeptics who perceive a lack of assimilation among newcomers. Multiculturalism is a great gift to the United States, so why worry? Also, assimilation is proceeding apace, so, again, why worry? The former assurance is generally directed at liberals, and the latter is directed at conservatives, but the underlying point is the same—nothing to see here, just move along. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
Pundits repeated the same assurances last month after Tom Brokaw remarked on how “Hispanics should work harder at assimilation,” and that “they ought not to be just codified in their communities but make sure that all their kids are learning to speak English.” Despite the furor and his subsequent apology, Brokaw is right to be concerned. When it comes to language assimilation, neither of the standard assurances is convincing.</blockquote>
Please read <a href="https://amgreatness.com/2019/02/20/the-threat-to-english/">the whole thing</a>.Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-57542040936726848672019-02-19T07:14:00.000-05:002019-02-19T12:02:13.633-05:00Faith in the unelected<div class="tr_bq">
I have <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/02/bureaucrats-civil-service-veto-presidential-policies/">a new essay</a> out this morning on the power of unelected officials within the government. It grew out of my frustration that judges are invoking "non-partisan experts" in the bureaucracy to strike down White House policies. Here's a sample:</div>
<blockquote>
Take Trump’s executive order that disqualified some transgender people from military service. In halting the order (later reinstated by the Supreme Court), a federal judge declared that Trump’s justifications were “contradicted by the studies, conclusions and judgment of the military itself.” The judge inferred that Trump must therefore be motivated by illegal “animus” toward transgender people. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
Now, perhaps the military’s studies are rigorous and not motivated at all by political correctness. Perhaps Trump’s new policy is indeed unjustifiable. Nevertheless, the danger here is obvious: <i>The military has effectively vetoed an order by the commander-in-chief</i>. If the military brass is owed such deference, it is easy to see how it could head off interference from the civilian leadership simply by producing a study that confirms its own beliefs.</blockquote>
Read <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/02/bureaucrats-civil-service-veto-presidential-policies/">the whole thing</a> at National Review.Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-91101979755777125432019-02-05T21:20:00.000-05:002019-02-06T08:08:25.312-05:00The 28 counties where a majority of school-age children speak Spanish at homeIt is no surprise to see California and Texas well represented on this list, but look at Kansas, Nebraska, and Washington. Concentrations of Spanish speakers can be found farther north than most people realize.<br />
<div>
<br />
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; text-align: justify; width: 516px;">
<colgroup><col style="mso-width-alt: 6912; mso-width-source: userset; width: 146pt;" width="194"></col>
<col style="mso-width-alt: 2645; mso-width-source: userset; width: 56pt;" width="74"></col>
<col style="mso-width-alt: 967; mso-width-source: userset; width: 20pt;" width="27"></col>
<col style="mso-width-alt: 3356; mso-width-source: userset; width: 71pt;" width="94"></col>
<col style="mso-width-alt: 967; mso-width-source: userset; width: 20pt;" width="27"></col>
<col style="mso-width-alt: 3555; mso-width-source: userset; width: 75pt;" width="100"></col>
</colgroup><tbody>
<tr height="58" style="height: 43.8pt;">
<td class="xl66" height="58" style="height: 43.8pt; width: 146pt;" width="194">County, State</td>
<td class="xl76" style="border-left: none; width: 56pt;" width="74">Total, ages 5-17</td>
<td class="xl77" style="width: 20pt;" width="27"></td>
<td class="xl78" style="width: 71pt;" width="94">speak Spanish at home, 5-17:</td>
<td class="xl77" style="width: 20pt;" width="27"></td>
<td class="xl79" style="width: 75pt;" width="100">% 5-17 who speak Spanish at home</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;"><br />
Starr, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;"><br />
14,649</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;"><br />
13,693</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;"><br />
93.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Maverick, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">12,963</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">11,341</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">87.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Webb, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">64,686</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">54,852</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">84.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Santa Cruz, Arizona</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">9,665</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">8,170</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">84.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Zapata, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">3,437</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">2,885</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">83.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Hidalgo, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">201,133</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">157,717</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">78.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Presidio, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">1,480</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">1,143</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">77.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Imperial, California</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">36,611</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">26,724</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">73.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Reagan, Texas</td>
<td class="xl71" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">818</td>
<td class="xl75" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl70" style="text-align: justify;">539</td>
<td class="xl75" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">65.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Seward, Kansas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">5,124</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">3,353</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">65.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Cameron, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">95,782</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">61,979</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">64.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Hudspeth, Texas</td>
<td class="xl71" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">692</td>
<td class="xl75" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl70" style="text-align: justify;">444</td>
<td class="xl75" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">64.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Ford, Kansas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">7,240</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">4,596</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">63.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Ochiltree, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">2,408</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">1,520</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">63.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Kenedy, Texas</td>
<td class="xl71" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">124</td>
<td class="xl75" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl70" style="text-align: justify;">77</td>
<td class="xl75" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">62.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Adams, Washington</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">4,768</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">2,936</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">61.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">El Paso, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">168,715</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">103,833</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">61.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Bailey, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">1,530</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl70" style="text-align: justify;">935</td>
<td class="xl75" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">61.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Monterey, California</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">81,463</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">49,172</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">60.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Val Verde, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">9,995</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">5,978</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">59.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Yuma, Arizona</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">37,866</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">22,630</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">59.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Miami-Dade, Florida</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">397,099</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">235,932</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">59.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Jeff Davis, Texas</td>
<td class="xl71" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">352</td>
<td class="xl75" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl70" style="text-align: justify;">205</td>
<td class="xl75" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">58.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Zavala, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">2,636</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">1,493</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">56.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Colfax, Nebraska</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">2,249</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">1,227</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">54.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Franklin, Washington</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">21,204</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">11,505</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">54.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Colusa, California</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">4,411</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">2,356</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">53.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" style="height: 15.0pt; mso-height-source: userset;">
<td class="xl67" height="20" style="height: 15pt; text-align: justify;">Titus, Texas</td>
<td class="xl68" style="border-left: none; text-align: justify;">7,007</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl69" style="text-align: justify;">3,655</td>
<td class="xl74" style="text-align: justify;"></td>
<td class="xl72" style="text-align: justify;">52.2%</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</div>
<div>
<br />
Source: American Community Survey, 5-year sample, 2013-2017</div>
Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-7449207209245721052019-01-21T17:01:00.002-05:002019-01-22T07:59:45.747-05:00Just say no to the two-minutes hateWhen the media claimed that white Catholic Trump-supporting boys mocked an elderly American Indian at a demonstration, several of my fellow conservatives participated in the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Minutes_Hate">two-minutes hate</a> against the boys, fanning the flames of Outrage Culture with over-the-top condemnations. <br />
<br />
After the story collapsed, apologies of the “I shouldn’t have rushed to judgment” variety were issued. One could fairly ask why anyone would ever rush to judgment after so many similar reports have crumbled upon further review. But there’s an even larger problem here -- it’s that too many conservatives felt the urge to weigh in at all. Even if the initial reporting had been accurate, it should have been filed away in the vast folder labeled “people being rude at a political protest” and dismissed without comment. By contrast, accusing Catholic kids of having metaphorically “<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190120180119/https:/www.nationalreview.com/corner/nathan-phillips-covington-catholic-high-school-march-for-life-mocking-students-spit-cross/">spit on the cross</a>” is about the worst possible response. Joining the pile-on legitimizes the media’s elevation of this inconsequential event and encourages more hysteria in the future.<br />
<br />
One might argue that it is “principled” for us to condemn all instances of conservatives behaving badly, while it would be “partisan” or “tribal” to ignore them. No. The principled response to a two-minutes hate is to reject it. Ridicule the idea that any lessons can be drawn from a single instance of some person being rude to another person in a country of 328 million. Oppose all manifestations of Outrage Culture.<br />
<br />
Obviously, the media focused on the MAGA-hatted white Catholic boys to bolster the narrative that all four groups – Trump supporters, whites, Christians, and males – are menaces to society. By that standard, however, virtually any political narrative finds support during demonstrations. Indeed, the boys were apparently being harassed by a group of black protesters shouting epithets. In response, should we demand an apology from the NAACP? Conclude that black nationalism is a dire threat? Write think pieces about how whites are oppressed? <br />
<br />
I’m not engaging in whataboutism. I’m rejecting the idea that any of these incidents say anything about the broader political situation. They do not deserve our attention, let alone our outrage.Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-9116174991911868842018-12-14T06:24:00.000-05:002018-12-14T16:24:46.766-05:00"The most conspicuous failure of high-immigration globalism"<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Dear <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a>: Public reporting states the killer in the terrorist attack was born in Strasbourg, France. So before you make any more despicable statements that use the deaths of innocent people for your own purposes, get your facts straight.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WednesdayWisdom?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WednesdayWisdom</a> <a href="https://t.co/izMIFUwhFU">https://t.co/izMIFUwhFU</a></p>— Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) <a href="https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1072834942948773888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 12, 2018</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><br />
Unfortunately, the Strasbourg attack makes an NR piece I wrote a year and a half ago relevant again:<br />
<blockquote>Western-born Muslim terrorists are actually the most conspicuous failure of high-immigration globalism. </blockquote><blockquote>For supporters of mass immigration on both sides of the Atlantic, the way to address Muslim terrorism is to forget the “Muslim” part and focus on the “terrorism” part. Carefully vet incoming immigrants to ensure they have no ties to terrorist groups, then let immersion in Western culture remove any latent sympathy for radicalism. Unfortunately, terrorism committed by Western-born Muslims discredits that approach. Such terrorists could never have been “vetted,” since they are not immigrants, and assimilation has obviously not worked for them. In fact, they are so disaffected, so alienated from Western culture, that they wish to kill their fellow citizens. </blockquote><blockquote>The immigration scholar Peter Skerry has observed that “assimilation is not a simple linear progression, but one that moves back and forth across the generations.” As the West accepts more Muslim immigrants, how much risk will we face from a “de-assimilated” second generation? That is a question that many would prefer not to confront. It would require acknowledging that Muslim immigration per se has fostered a small but dangerous Islamic terrorist movement within the West itself. It would also require acknowledging that the world’s peoples are not interchangeable parts that can be scattered around the globe without long-term consequences. For that reason, Western-born Muslim terrorists are like a glitch in the Matrix — a dose of reality that immigration advocates cannot explain away. </blockquote>Read the <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/salman-abedi-manchester-bomber-western-born-muslim-terrorists/">whole thing</a>.Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-4663944822274479002018-12-07T16:17:00.000-05:002018-12-07T16:17:58.763-05:00The most amazing turnaroundU.S. oil production peaked in 1970 and then began a slow, decades-long decline. Like most people, I assumed the decline would continue indefinitely. It seemed we had extracted most of the oil that was cost-effective to extract, and now other countries could produce oil more cheaply. In 2008, no one was expecting a sudden recovery. Well, let me re-phrase that: <i>I </i>wasn't expecting a recovery, and if energy industry experts were bullish at the time, their optimism didn't trickle down to the masses. Nevertheless, U.S. oil production not only increased after 2008 but reached record levels -- all in just ten years! This is an amazing accomplishment for the energy industry and one of the U.S. economy's great success stories.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4JslZXUT1nzcchFmK0_R2ZmxQSLFiLY_YhEiO7cH8qdWETBcJaD6SIl4Fap_3OTmY6vqjwkIklYUopRPqCrn10EySvQaCkWhYcoK1aewPbY_bMX6PicVkCjHCBavV8-0B4EW6gjblyu0/s1600/chart.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="647" data-original-width="970" height="289" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4JslZXUT1nzcchFmK0_R2ZmxQSLFiLY_YhEiO7cH8qdWETBcJaD6SIl4Fap_3OTmY6vqjwkIklYUopRPqCrn10EySvQaCkWhYcoK1aewPbY_bMX6PicVkCjHCBavV8-0B4EW6gjblyu0/s400/chart.png" width="435" /></a></div>
<br />
Most people have heard about fracking, horizontal drilling, the North Dakota boom, and so on. But how many people are aware that the overall production increase has been this steep?Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6177735060190574172.post-64792701818000378932018-12-04T18:59:00.000-05:002018-12-11T08:48:27.181-05:00On the new public charge ruleAs I discussed <a href="http://www.jasonrichwine.com/2018/05/who-is-public-charge.html">here</a> last spring, the Trump Administration has proposed a new rule to enforce the statutory ban on admitting any alien who is "likely to become a public charge." The new definition of public charge will be "an alien who receives one or more public benefits." That replaces the old interpretation of a public charge as someone who "primarily" relies on certain cash handouts or long-term care. In my opinion, the new rule is clearly an improvement, but it doesn't go far enough. Here are the five key points from the <a href="https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nXVrQD4s9lrJ29hqrf34QVk-389FmcOO">formal comment</a> I submitted:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
1.<span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>Immigrant welfare use is high. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
2.<span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>The public charge law is rarely enforced. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
3.<span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>Any receipt of means-tested anti-poverty benefits by immigrants or their dependents should count toward the public charge determination. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
4.<span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>Immigrants without at least some college should bear a heavy burden in proving they will not become public charges. Having a job is not enough. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
5.<span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>Case-by-case discretionary power should be limited.</blockquote>
Please read the whole thing for the details. The comment period is open until December 10.<br />
<br />
Also, please enjoy this video of me talking about the problem of immigrant welfare use.<br />
<br />
<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="276" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-HqHCKErVYU" width="490"></iframe>Jason Richwinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12322702869663924123noreply@blogger.com0